By Alfredo Jalife-Rahme, Mexico City / Mexico *
* Professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), expert on geopolitical analysis
The deep relationship between presidential candidate Kamala Harris and the Olymp of the Democratic Party, where mega-speculator George Soros, former President Obama and the Clinton couple (Bill and Hillary) stand out, has been shown with hard facts and even compromising photos.
I will leave aside Kamala’s known ties to her mentor Willie Brown, former mayor of San Francisco – which are summarized in Timothy Scott’s controversial book “WILLIE BROWN: The Untold Story of His Influence on California and his Role in Kamala Harris’s Rise” (https://amzn.to/4eI7Gkj ) – and other intimate ties to the omnipotent Hollywood industry where her now husband, the Khazarian (https://bit.ly/3QqemJr ) Doug Emhoff, previously a lawyer, who has become a fervent critic of what he calls “anti-Semitism” that omits the antonym of the “Semites” that includes the Canaanite-Phoenicians and the Arabs, but not the Khazars who are not Semites (https://bit.ly/4bpyNzl ).
Never before has been elucidated, according to recent financial excavations, Kamala’s powerful link with the most powerful global bank BlackRock, specialized in investment management, which operates a sum of around US$10 trillion. If the bank were a country, it would be third in the world ranking behind second place China with a nominal GDP of US$18.5 billion or equivalent to almost a third of the first place held by the US with US$28.72 billion.
The stock market power of BlackRock is widely known, led by the Khazarian Larry Fink – a frequent visitor to the top of power in Mexico, where he maintains important strategic investments – I highly recommend the book “The Secret Empire BlackRock: The Emergence of BlackRock and its Doiminance of the World of Finance” by Edward T. Branson (https://bit.ly/3zG2ZIK ).
Super heavyweight Brian Deese is being heavily considered to be in charge of Kamala’s economic strategy, along with Hillary Clinton, who would be her advisor on domestic and international policy matters, according to a note from The Washington Post.
Is Hillary Kamala’s political double and financial partner through BlackRock’s obstetric lubrication?
Brian Deese was BlackRock’s Global Head of Sustainable Investment. During the Obama administration, he served as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and later held the relevant position of the National Economic Council (https://bit.ly/4gOiwH6 ). By the way, Brian Deese was the creator of the failed “Bidenomics” that superlatively indebted the US.
Hillary’s relationship with BlackRock is two-way.
As such, Cheryl D. Mills, Hillary’s former advisor and chief of staff, was added to BlackRock’s Board of Directors.
The investigative portal The Intercept went so far as to reveal that the BlackRock team would take over the Treasury in Hillary’s cabinet (https://bit.ly/47N0LUx ).
Prominent Black Rock COO Matthew Mallow supported very generously to Hillary’s failed campaign that lost to Trump.
“BlackRock, the company that controls the world”, but above all the US, still the world’s largest economy. ActionsPills goes out of its way to prove what is well known: “BlackRock is the shareholder of 88% of the top 500 most important companies in the US (https://bit.ly/4gK9evY ). It is also the majority shareholder of the largest banks in Spain, such as Banco Santander and BBVA. (…) In 2016, BlackRock controlled the investments of the 19 main companies in Spain, for a value of more than 12 billion euros. (…) BlackRock has the largest percentage of shares in Apple, Amazon, Facebook (only behind Mark Zuckerberg), Coca-Cola, Twitter, PepsiCo, Ferrari, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, McDonald’s, Pfizer, Uber, Alphabet Google (they control more than 5.6% in third place), Microsoft…etc.
With this huge stock market support, it seems almost idle to conjecture that Kamala would hardly fail to be the next president of the US, unless the Deep State and its astonishing “October surprises” say otherwise, which can redirect the vote according to its current geopolitical interests.
This article was published in Spanish on the author’s substack account. Translation by UWI.